Democrats are facing installation calls from critics to return or even donate to charity millions within campaign contributions from Harvey Weinstein after the New York Timesâ? bombshell statement detailing sexual harassment allegations simply by numerous women against the Oscar-winning film mogul spanning three decades.
On CNNâs âState of the Unionâ Sunday, Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., said he agrees alleged dirty money ought to be returned.
âThis is a pretty bad guy who did some really awful things,â Murphy said. âAnd, you know, if people need for that money to be returned in order to make it clear that the entities that received them want nothing to do with him and his behavior, then it is probably a smart move.â
According to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics, Weinstein and his family have given a lot more than $1. 4 million in politics contributions since the 1992 election routine â? including nearly $800, 000 to the Democratic National Committee.
DNC spokeswoman Xochitl Hinojosa told the particular Associated Press that the organization programs to donate more than $30, 000 â? Weinsteinâs personal contribution towards the DNC during the 2016 campaign â? to three charities benefitting females.
Numerous Democratic lawmakers â? which includes Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer; Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass.; plus Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N. Con. â? say they intend to contribute Weinsteinâs contributions to charities helping women.
On NBCâs âMeet the Press,â Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., said the girl was unaware if Weinstein acquired made any contributions to her during the past.
âI donât know that Iâve received any,â Feinstein said. âIâll certainly take a look, and then Iâll make a decision.â
Related: Democrats begin shunning Harvey Weinstein advertising campaign donations
On Thursday, the Times reported that will Weinstein reached at least eight funds with women who accused your pet of sexual harassment between 1990 and 2015. The newspaper furthermore included accounts from other women, which includes actress Ashley Judd, who remembered he asked her to watch your pet shower during a breakfast meeting in the hotel suite in the mid 1990s.
In a statement, Weinstein apologized for his behavior, blaming this in part on the office culture that will existed when he began his profession.
âI came of age in the â60s and â70s, when all the rules about behavior and workplaces were different,â he said. âI have since learned itâs not an excuse, in the office â or out of it.â
Weinstein additional, âI realized some time ago that I needed to be a better person and my interactions with the people I work with have changed. I appreciate the way Iâve behaved with colleagues in the past has caused a lot of pain, and I sincerely apologize for it.â
The 65-year-old also said he could be taking a leave of absence through his film studio, the Weinstein Company. The companyâs board associated with directors said it is planning to check out the sexual harassment complaints towards him.
Murphy, who has never received money through Weinstein, said accepting campaign money from controversial figures is a bipartisan issue.
âLetâs be honest. We take tens of thousands of contributions,â Murphy said. âI donât require a background check to contribute to my campaign. And so there are probably lots of people with unsavory backgrounds and pasts who have given to both Democrats and Republicans. But this was a high-profile individual who did some truly awful things, and people that took money from him should probably give it back.â
Meanwhile, two high-profile Democrats have however to comment on the revelations: Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
Both have ties to the disgraced movie producer: Weinstein hosted fundraisers to get both Obama and Clinton on his homes during their 2012 plus 2016 presidential campaigns. And Obamaâs daughter, Malia, served as an inwendig with the Weinstein Company this year.
Read more from Yahoo News: