My wife recently decided to print out one hundred or so of the best photographs we’ve used with our smartphones over the years. Looking at all of them, I’ve noticed something interesting: Over fifty percent of them were selfies.
It’s hardly surprising. Rear cameras are good for taking photos of sunsets, however for those family moments you really want to consider, a selfie makes more feeling. So why are rear cameras upon phones vastly better than the selfie cameras?
China’s Vivo, a highly regarded five smartphone manufacturer but not perfectly known outside of its home market, reverses this situation completely with its Vivo 7+ phone. This smartphone has a 16-megapixel shooter on the back, and a greatly better, 24-megapixel camera on the front side. Â
I’ve spent about fourteen days with the Vivo 7+ to see whether or not this configuration makes any feeling, and while the answer isn’t as simple when you might think, I can tell you one thing: I actually took a ton of great selfies along the way. Â
I’m not going to go into several details on the Vivo 7+ beyond camera performance. It’s a good, when cheap (about $338), midrange Google android phone with a somewhat paltry Snapdragon 450 processor, 4GB of RAM MEMORY, and 64GB of storage. They have a 6-inch, 1, 440 by 720-pixel LCD screen, a several, 225mAh battery and a fingerprint scanning device on the back. I used the cell phone mostly to take photos, and the digital cameras were surprisingly snappy, which was a pleasing surprise. Â
It ships along with Android 7. 1 . 2 plus a fair amount of bloatware on top, many of which you can thankfully remove. The Funtouch OS that Vivo 7+ operates on top of Android is mostly an iOS ripoff, complete with the lack of app cabinet, but I’ve gotten used to this fairly quickly. Â
The variant I have tested was matte black (you actually can also get it in champagne precious metal color), and with relatively small bezels all around (not as small as on, state, the Samsung Galaxy Note eight, but not as big as on the Pixel 2), it looks pretty good. The plastic entire body and the antenna lines on top plus bottom, however , cheapen the look a little. Â
I’ve welcomed the presence of the head-phone jack, but I scoffed in the microUSB charging port. It’s 2017, USB-C is a must, and even mid-range phones should get with the system.
Put all of that together, and also you get yourself a pretty nondescript, solidly constructed, inexpensive smartphone. But its most important function is that selfie camera, so let’s take a have a closer look at that.
How many megapixels?
The Vivo 7+ selfie camera is great. It will take crisp, huge photos in daytime, it takes really good photos in reduced light, and it’s generally the best selfie camera I’ve ever tested. Â
And to answer the title’s question, yes, a 24-megapixel selfie camera does make sense. It is a little bit of an overkill; after all, the best cell phones out there â? the latest iPhones as well as the Samsung â? only have a 12-megapixel main camera, and no one’s worrying. But hey, when the photo high quality is this good, I don’t brain. The only downside is these photos undertake more storage space, but I can experience that, and the Vivo 7+ allows you to expand its memory with a 256GB microSD card. Â
It depends upon photo quality. If the selfie digital camera can deliver better-looking pics without having to sacrifice speed or convenience too much, precisely why the hell not?
Here are a couple of daylight selfies I have taken with the Vivo. Colors could be a bit off, but the amount of details is great. If I ever decide to print out these out, they will look greatly better than any of the selfies I’ve used with other phones. Â
For group selfies, Let me have a bit of a wider angle. Seems testing LG’s V30 which has a wide-angle selfie mode, and it’s really helpful. The Vivo 7+ doesn’t have that will, but it does have a “group selfie” mode, which is similar to taking a vistas shot, and it produces fairly substandard results (though this depends on just how steady your hand is). Â
Where the Vivo 7+ actually shines is nighttime selfies â? and that’s despite the f/2. 0 aperture size, which is not that excellent nowadays. No matter how dark it is, this particular phone will give you a decent photo. Look into the comparison below: The photo in the left was taken late at night with the Vivo 7+; the one in the right was taken seconds later on with the LG V30. The difference is totally stunning. Â
Emboldened by this result, I’ve used it a step further and attempted to take a selfie in near-total night. Amazingly, without any sort of flash, Vivo 7+’s camera managed to produce… properly, something. No other selfie camera I have tested comes close to this. I’ve attempted shooting in those same circumstances with the LG G6, which has a good 8-megapixel selfie camera, but body fat need to show you that photo since it’s just a slab of blackness.
So is the Vivo 7+ the perfect selfie phone? Unfortunately, number Â
The selfie camera, just like it is, sometimes produces photos along with completely messed-up colors. Â
It also offers a bokeh mode that’s definitely atrocious. I’m not crazy about bokeh in the first place, but the Vivo 7+ can nearly always screw it up by cloudy unwanted parts of the photo.
Finally, the digital camera software lacks some very basic choices. For example , you cannot take photos which are smaller than 24 megapixels. Additionally you can’t change the photo size in any way. Â
And then there’s the particular 16-megapixel rear camera, which is fine but not nearly as good as the best Google android cameras out there. It’ll produce good photos in the daylight, but when this gets darker, the photos can get blurry and the details will vanish. The examples below are far blurrier and more lifeless than I would have liked. Â
The world needs better selfie cameras
The Vivo 7+ can be far from a perfect phone. While general pretty great, even its 24-megapixel front camera has a couple of disadvantages. Still, I’d recommend it in order to someone that really, really likes having selfies. Â
But my experience of this device has convinced me that every smartphone manufacturers should work to enhance selfie cameras. There’s no reason why the selfie camera should be atrocious when compared to rear one â? I’m taking a look at you, LG V30, and your bad, 5-megapixel selfie camera. Â
In fact, I see no good reason why the particular selfie camera wouldn’t be just as good as the rear camera. Broad angle shots, bokeh, nice quality â? why reserve these functions only for the rear camera, if real, real-life users take tons of selfies? On the flip side, as the Vivo 7+ shows, the selfie camera shouldn’t be significantly better than the rear camera, either. Â
The bottom line is that the world requirements phones that have amazing cameras to both sides. Hopefully we’ll start seeing all those soon. Â
Great selfie camera
Weak PROCESSOR â? *********************************) Unimpressive rear digital camera â? *********************************) MicroUSB charging port
The Bottom Line
The Vivo 7+ will be a good fit for that selfie-obsessed, but you can find better cell phones out there for the price.